| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:54:39 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org> Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-08-04 On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:42:03PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > > Luis R. Rodriguez (4): > > > > list.h: Add list_splice_tail() and list_splice_tail_init() > > > > list.h: add list_cut_position() > > > > > > have these two changes got reviewed on LKML? I don't see any ACKs for it > > > in the commit message. > > > > Hmmm...no. I thought the original patches had been copied to > > linux-kernel, but it looks like that is not the case. > > > > The original patches are archived here: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783421908441&w=2 > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=121783422008445&w=2 > > > > What problems do you see with them? > > I don't see a problem with these patches, but they should at least be > reviewed on LKML once. Changes to core kernel infrastructure should not > be merged silently via subsystem trees without any kind of ACKs. Yes, fine. That wasn't my intent. :-) The patches were originally posted about two weeks ago, too bad that didn't actually go to linux-kernel. :-( John -- John W. Linville linville@...driver.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists