[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:34:12 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jeremy@...p.org,
hugh@...itas.com, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 9/7] mm: fix mm_take_all_locks() locking order
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 11:46:42PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> furthermore I doubt it works because with regular kvm I get 57 vmas
> filebacked alone, did you test 8/7, I didn't yet but I can test if you
Correction: 57 are the vmas but counting with something less coarse
than grep lib |wc -l, there are less inodes backing those vmas than
the nesting limit, so 8/7 is ok for now (as long as check_deadlock
exists at least).
Thanks again!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists