lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:34:36 +0800
From:	Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>
Cc:	"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.27-rc2 in acpi_processor_init()

On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 23:02 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [Adding CCs]
> 
Hi, Mark
   Will you please attach the output of acpidump on bug 11287?
   Of course it will be great if you can enable CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG and
CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DEBUG in kernel configuration  and boot the system with
the option of "cpufreq.debug=7 acpi.debug_layer=0x01010000
acpi.debug_level=0x17".
   After the system is booted, please attach the output of dmesg.
   Please do the above test on both kernel 2.6.27-rc1 and 2.6.27-rc2.

Thanks.
> On Friday, 8 of August 2008, Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
> > I got a regression when updated from 2.6.27-rc1 ro
> > 2.6.27-rc2.  The noticeable symptom is the powernow-k8
> > driver stopped working because the call to 
> > acpi_processor_register_performance() is returning
> > -EINVAL.
> >
> > Digging into the code a bit more, that's occurring
> > because acpi_processor_ppc_status is not set.
> > That should be set in acpi_processor_init(), but
> > that function is failing to register the ACPI
> > processor driver.
> > 
> > I've dug through the code and can't see why 
> > that call would fail.  It doesn't look like there
> > were any changes between 2.6.27-rc1 and 2.6.27-rc2,
> > but I may have missed something.
> > 
> > Any advice or suggestions in debugging this 
> > appreciated.
> > 
> > -Mark Langsdorf
> > Operating System Research Center
> > AMD
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ