linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch make struct scsi_dh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>
cc:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch make struct scsi_dh_devlist's static



On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>
> This patch makes several needlessly global struct scsi_dh_devlist's 
> static.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@...ibm.com>

This is not a valid sign-off chain.

Was the patch originally done by Adrian? If so, where is the

	From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>

at the top?

And since you're forwarding it, you should be signing off on it, not just 
acking it. Otherwise, the next person in the chain can't sign off on it 
and take it.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/