| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:59:19 +0200 From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, jmorris@...ei.org, hch@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net, sfrench@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] CRED: Introduce credential access wrappers Hi David, On Tuesday 12 August 2008, David Howells wrote: > Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de> wrote: > > > Why macros? When introducing APIs using trivial inlines makes sure that > > the conversion is correct, type correct and side effect free for the callers. > > Macros cannot ensure this without pain. > > But macros don't care that you can't access current at this point. Ok, if that is the only reason, please mention this in the commit message. That would be enough for me to not wonder about this issue. But I wonder how you solve this issue if the amount of code behinde your wrappers grows. If you have to take them out of line, it would give me a good indication of the costs involved in the later bodies of these now trivial wrappers, if you do it right away. That way you'll find missing includes and whatnot while converting existing code to the trivial wrappers. Best Regards Ingo Oeser -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists