linux-kernel - Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 1/1] iwlwifi: fix printk newlines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:38:16 +0800
From:	Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
To:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	ipw3945-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [PATCH 1/1] iwlwifi: fix printk newlines

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 05:59 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > We should give the users more control to the style I think.
> 
> what kind of control do you expect? If you need two lines of debug or
> error output, call IWL_ERROR twice. This will also result in the
> KERN_ERR is set and not forgotten since that has to follow the
> newline.

I thought sometimes we might not need a new line between two IWL_ERRORs.
But your KERN_ERR garbaging the output in this case is correct. I think
when we wrote the macro, we just follow the style of dev_info() ...
dev_emerg() macros. Do you know why there is not a new line for them by
default?

Thanks,
-yi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/