lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:05:45 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/22] byteorder: remove the old byteorder implementation On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:27:17 -0700 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote: > include/linux/byteorder/Kbuild | 3 - > include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h | 108 --------------- > include/linux/byteorder/generic.h | 173 ------------------------ > include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h | 108 --------------- > include/linux/byteorder/swab.h | 222 ------------------------------- > include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h | 135 ------------------- akpm2:/usr/src/25> make headers_check CHK include/linux/version.h make[1]: `scripts/unifdef' is up to date. /usr/src/devel/scripts/Makefile.headersinst:15: /usr/src/devel/include/linux/byteorder/Kbuild: No such file or directory make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/devel/include/linux/byteorder/Kbuild'. Stop. This is just a basic i386 allmodconfig :( The largest risk from these patches is build breakage, and it is quite obvious that they have not had anything like adequate build coverage testing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists