lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:56:27 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 14 (sysfs/acpi errors)

Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 08:38:28AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> calling  param_sysfs_init+0x0/0x1e7
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:463 sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d()
>> sysfs: duplicate filename 'acpi' can not be created
> 
> Why would this be a sysfs error, it's acpi doing something foolish,
> that's why the sysfs layer is warning about it :)

The NULL pointer reference further down actually looks like something
foolish in the sysfs layer. But actually ACPI is not doing
anything wrong here I think. According to the backtrace it happens
when a kernel param (aka module_param) is set. And creating multiple
params in the same acpi space is completely legal.

It looks more like the high level code that sets up these parameters
broke somehow and starts registering these twice and now ACPI is the
first one to hit it (maybe because it starts with 'a' :-). Or perhaps
sysfs checking just got more anal and the params code relied on
being able to register duplicate directories?

Putting rusty into cc.

-Andi

calling  param_sysfs_init+0x0/0x1e7
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:463 sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d()
sysfs: duplicate filename 'acpi' can not be created
Modules linked in:
Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27-rc3-next-20080814 #1

Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff802358cb>] warn_slowpath+0xae/0xdd
  [<ffffffff8036a6be>] ? number+0x115/0x21f
  [<ffffffff8036574d>] ? __next_cpu+0x19/0x26
  [<ffffffff8022d575>] ? find_busiest_group+0x25b/0x6ee
  [<ffffffff8036aefc>] ? string+0x3d/0xa2
  [<ffffffff80365e02>] ? idr_get_empty_slot+0x161/0x24e
  [<ffffffff8036b2ea>] ? vsnprintf+0x389/0x678
  [<ffffffff802def96>] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x14
  [<ffffffff802aa5bf>] ? ifind+0x3d/0xac
  [<ffffffff802df1bd>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x1c/0x31
  [<ffffffff802df1f1>] ? __sysfs_add_one+0x1f/0x7c
  [<ffffffff802df283>] sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d
  [<ffffffff802df7d2>] create_dir+0x58/0x93
  [<ffffffff802df845>] sysfs_create_dir+0x38/0x4f
  [<ffffffff80366b8a>] kobject_add_internal+0xce/0x18f
  [<ffffffff80366d17>] kobject_add_varg+0x41/0x4d
  [<ffffffff80366d91>] kobject_init_and_add+0x6e/0x7c
  [<ffffffff803676e5>] ? kobject_uevent_env+0x350/0x37f
  [<ffffffff802455bf>] ? param_sysfs_setup+0xe1/0x104
  [<ffffffff80764a30>] kernel_param_sysfs_setup+0x6b/0xc6
  [<ffffffff80764bee>] param_sysfs_init+0x163/0x1e7
  [<ffffffff80249b00>] ? ktime_get_ts+0x14/0x4e
  [<ffffffff80764a8b>] ? param_sysfs_init+0x0/0x1e7
  [<ffffffff80209047>] _stext+0x47/0x13f
  [<ffffffff80269f25>] ? register_irq_proc+0xb7/0xd3
  [<ffffffff807508e5>] kernel_init+0x11b/0x171
  [<ffffffff802311ef>] ? schedule_tail+0x28/0x60
  [<ffffffff8020ce49>] child_rip+0xa/0x11
  [<ffffffff807507ca>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x171
  [<ffffffff8020ce3f>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x11
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ