linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: make gpio_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:33:43 +0400
From:	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: make gpio_to_chip() public

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:58:46PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
[...]
> > Not exactly. But you can do this way, if you need to preserve
> > a direction. What I did is a bit different though.
> > 
> > qe_gpio_set_dedicated() actually just restores a mode that
> > firmware had set up, including direction (since direction could
> > be a part of dedicated configuration).
> > 
> > That is, upon GPIO controller registration, we save all registers,
> > then driver can set up a pin to a GPIO mode via standard API, and
> > then it can _revert_ a pin to a dedicated function via
> > qe_gpio_set_dedicated() call. Dedicated function is specified by
> > the firmware (or board file), we're just restoring it.
> 
> The semantic of the set_dedicated() operation needs to be clearly
> defined then.

It is. We set up a dedicated function that firmware (or board file)
has configured.

> I can live with this behaviour, but it might not be
> acceptable for everybody.

For example?

> Your patch requires the firmware to set a pin in dedicated mode at
> bootup in order to be used later in dedicated mode.

Yes. On a PowerPC this is always true: firmware should set up PIO
config. Linux' board file could fixup the firmware though.

Another option would be to add some argument to the set_dedicated
call, thus the software could specify arbitrary dedicated
function (thus no need to save/restore anything). But this would
be SOC-model specific, thus no driver can use this argument anyway.

> If, for some
> reason (driver not loaded, ...), no GPIO user shows up for that
> pin, it will stay configured in dedicated mode.

Yes.

> It might be better to set the PAR bit unconditionally in

Why it might be better? That way you may set up wrong _GPIO_
mode, because you didn't set PAR bit (when PAR bit set
DIR/ODR/DAT bits are losing their meanings).

> qe_gpio_set_dedicated() instead of restoring its value. That way
> the board initialization code could just set the DIR, DAT and ODR
> bits for dedicated mode but still configure the pin in GPIO mode.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/