linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] Power management for SCSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:50:38 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
	"Linux-pm mailing list" <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, teheo@...ell.com
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Power management for SCSI

Am Dienstag 19 August 2008 09:38:39 schrieb Pavel Machek:
 
> Would it make sense to split the patches into "autosuspend for SCSI
> devices" and "autosuspend for SCSI controllers" for easier
> review/merge? I guess I'll start with the devices, they seem easier...

Runtime PM will have to leave devices alone while error handling is active.
Unfortunately error handling is done at controller level. So I am afraid
this would be very difficult.

	Regards
		Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/