lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:01:04 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Louis.Rilling@...labs.com
Cc:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jeremy@...p.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 7/9] Infrastructure for shared objects

On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 12:40 +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> 
> > +struct cr_objhash {
> > +     struct cr_obj **hash;
> > +     int next_tag;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define CR_OBJHASH_NBITS  10 /* 10 bits = 1K buckets */
> > +#define CR_OBJHASH_ORDER  0  /* 1K buckets * 4 bytes/bucket = 1
> page */
> 
> Only true when PAGE_SIZE == 4K and in 32bits. Perhaps like below?
> 
> #define CR_OBJHASH_BUCKET_NBITS (BITS_PER_LONG == 64 ? 3 : 2)
> #define CR_MIN_OBJHASH_NBITS ((PAGE_SHIFT - CR_OBJHASH_BUCKET_NBITS)
> #define CR_OBJHASH_NBITS (CR_MIN_OBJHASH_NBITS >= 10 ?
> CR_MIN_OBJHASH_NBITS : 10)
> #define CR_OBJHASH_ORDER (CR_OBJHASH_NBITS + CR_OBJHASH_BUCKET_NBITS -
> PAGE_SHIFT)

Gah.  Can't we just use the existing radix tree or hash implementations
we already have?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ