linux-kernel - Frustrated with capabilities..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:31:10 +0300
From:	Markku Savela <msa@...h.iki.fi>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Frustrated with capabilities..

I just want to run an exectable with limited capabilities and assumed
the following approach would work fine:

 1) fork process
 2) in child

    2.1 set current capabilities (eip) using cap_set_proc
    2.2 execve the executable.

But it frigging does not work! Just before the execve, the result of
cap_to_text is

    = cap_net_bind_service+eip

but, in the execve executable, the result is suddenly

    = cap_net_bind_service+i

Why does the execve clear the effective and permitted capabities,
against my clear instructions? (I also have the prctl KEEP_CAPS set,
though in this case it should be irrelevant).

- The kernel is from ubuntu distro, 2.6.24.

- the executable *does* *not* have any setuid/setgid bits

- the upcoming file capabities will not be any help, because I will
  need to start the same executable with different capabilities
  depending on context.

If this is not a bug in kernel, it is a misdesign, which makes the
obvious use of cap_set_proc rather useless...

-- 
Markku Savela
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/