linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc5: System boot regression caused by commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4dfdb8c0591f545ba749dd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:10:59 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, "Tejun Heo" <htejun@...il.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"David Witbrodt" <dawitbro@...global.net>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kernel Testers" <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.27-rc5: System boot regression caused by commit a2bd7274b47124d2fc4dfdb8c0591f545ba749dd

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 of August 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>> >> On Saturday, 30 of August 2008, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> >>> please check
>> >>>
>> >>> [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4
>> >>> [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4 - fix v6
>> >>
>> >> What kernel should I apply those to and in what order?
>> >
>> > linus git tree
>> > 1. [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4
>> > 2. [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4 - fix v6
>> >
>> > tip/master
>> > 1. Resource handling: add 'insert_resource_expand_to_fit()' function
>> > 2. [PATCH] x86: split e820 reserved entries record to late v4 - fix v6
>>
>> actually it is almost the same to tar ball send you for your system...
>
> I've just tested these two patches on top of the current Linus' tree and the
> system works normally.
>

Can you try attached in addition to those to patches ?

want to check if the BAR3 get new resource..., and after that what
could happen...

YH

View attachment "assign_resource_for_bar_in_host_bridge.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (640 bytes)