linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: fill f

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:03:52 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@...radead.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <ext-adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBIFS: fill f_fsid

On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 11:01 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > For btrfs I xor the first 64 bits with the second 64 bits, and put
> > _that_ into f_fsid. You're just putting the first 64 bits in and
> > ignoring the second 64 bits. Neither is really _better_ than the other;
> > you just alter the circumstances in which you get collisions. But I
> > suppose we might as well be consistent about how we do it?
> 
> XFS just puts in the st_dev.  And I can't realy find any useful
> defintion of what it's supposed to b anyway..

For me this means that we should rather do what XFS does for
consistency then.

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/