linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:33:06 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hugh@...itas.com,
	menage@...gle.com, xemul@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Remove cgroup member from struct page

On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:07:18 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I understand your concern and I am not trying to reduce memcg's performance - or
> add a fancy feature. I am trying to make memcg more friendly for distros. I see
> your point about the overhead. I just got back my results - I see a 4% overhead
> with the patches. Let me see if I can rework them for better performance.
> 
Just an idea, by using atomic_ops page_cgroup patch, you can encode page_cgroup->lock
to page_cgroup->flags and use bit_spinlock(), I think.
(my new patch set use bit_spinlock on page_cgroup->flags for avoiding some race.)

This will save extra 4 bytes.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/