linux-kernel - Re: [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for setup_IO_APIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2008 20:38:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	yhlu.kernel@...il.com, macro@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] x86: io-apic - code style cleaning for
	setup_IO_APIC_irqs


* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> So as you see it's more then enough self-solid :) So I wouldn't break 
> it 'cause of printing. If we have enough memory for bit field - we 
> could just mark there if pin is connected to irq and print connection 
> map after. Don't get me wrong please - I just don't want to overload 
> this function with additional call.

the compiler will inline that single-called function just fine, as long 
as you declare it static.

spreading printouts over several functions isnt all that bad i think. We 
could even drop the 'not connected' complication - it's evident enough 
from the fact that nothing gets printed.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/