lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 6 Sep 2008 09:14:34 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Luca Tettamanti" <kronos.it@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [2.6.27] overlapping early reservations [was: early exception - lockdep related?]

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 21:17 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Sadly your config just boots, albeit not to userspace due to missing
>>>>>> drivers.
>>>>> Yes, I managed to boot it with qemu... I tried kgdb - without luck -
>>>>> kernel dies too early.
>>>>> I also managed to get a stack trace :D
>>>>>
>>>>> http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=tracedm1.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that lockdep is an innocent bystander... the kernel died with
>>>>> panic() in __reserve_early, and then took another exception while
>>>>> printing the panic (I guess).
>>>>> Will add further debug stuff to see wtf is going on.
>>>> Hum, kernel says:
>>>>
>>>> http://img177.imageshack.us/my.php?image=overlappingus2.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Overlapping early reservations b98000-eff266 RAMDISK to 200000-d09cf7
>>>> TEXT DATA BSS
>>>>
>>>> It would appear that the initramfs is overlapping the kernel itself,
>>>> is the boot loader (LILO) doing something stupid?
>>>
>>> Suppose it is, lets ask hpa..
>>>
>>
>> It definitely looks like it.
>
> yeah. Kernel is loaded at the standard 2MB physical, and goes up to
> 13.6MB physical. That's a tad large at 11.6 MB but still valid.
>
> ramdisk image goes from 11.6 MB to 14.9 MB - roughly standard size. That
> overlaps 2 MB into the kernel image so we have to panic. LILO should
> have loaded the ramdisk somewhere else. (or should have aborted the boot
> if it cannot do that)
>
> We could perhaps print a prominent warning, delay the boot for 5 seconds
> or so via mdelay(5000) and simply not load the ramdisk if this happens?
> The kernel is obviously still functional - and such a large vmlinuz
> likely has all the built-in drivers to boot up to user-space - the lack
> of the ramdisk does not necessarily hurt .
>
wonder if lilo is fixing bzImage from 1M, and when it is calculating
pos of ramdisk...base that
later on-same-position uncompressing, put vmlinux from 2M...

it seems kexec is puting initrd as high as possible, or could specify
the ramdisk postion ..

wonder if new lilo could help.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ