linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86: Add "virt flags"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:04:23 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86: Add "virt flags"

Sheng Yang <sheng.yang@...el.com> writes:
>
> But I still have concern, for this may broke some not that reliable userspace
> programs. So Avi suggested that we can add more fields to flags rather than a
> new catagory.


FWIW when I added the "power management:" flags back then for the
64bit kernel I didn't get any reports of user programs breaking. Also
some other fields got added like cpu cores or initial apicid etc. and
that also didn't lead to breakage. So adding new lines to cpuinfo
should be ok.

-Andi
-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/