[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:22:48 +1000
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: david-b@...bell.net, James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
alessandro.zummo@...ertech.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix RTC_CLASS regression with PARISC
David Miller writes:
> int update_persistent_clock(struct timespec now)
> {
> struct rtc_device *rtc = rtc_class_open("rtc0");
>
> if (rtc)
> return rtc_set_mmss(rtc, now.tv_sec);
>
> return -1;
> }
>
> and that should handle this NTP shouldn't it?
Yes as long as your rtc set functions don't need to sleep, since
update_persistent_clock is called at interrupt level. Some powerpc
systems have their RTC at the far end of an I2C bus, and the I2C
access routines can sleep.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists