linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: define USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS rather than repeating expression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:28:29 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
cc:	Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: define USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS rather than repeating
 expression

On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Define USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS as a constant expression rather than repeating
> "NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS" all over the place.

Yes, that's much more readable, thanks Jeremy.

> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>

Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/