linux-kernel - Re: [2.6.27-rc5] inotify_read's ev_mutex vs do_page_fault's mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:57:35 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc:	Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mingo <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [2.6.27-rc5] inotify_read's ev_mutex vs do_page_fault's
 mmap_sem...

On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 14:07 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2008 07:03, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> > I observed this locking violation [1] while gnome-panel was loading;
> > this was previously reported at
> > http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0806.3/2881.html .
> >
> > Let me know for more information/config/testing. Thanks!
> 
> Thanks for the report. I've attached a patch you could test. It compiles
> (and boots a UML here) but I don't think I've actually tested the inotify
> path at all, so it may explode on you.
> 
> Peter, this copy_*_user stuff is quite a nightmare... Well actually it
> isn't, if the code is designed with it in mind from the start, but it is
> easy for people to forget it can take mmap_sem and filesystem locks... Is
> there a way to annotate it and say "might take mmap_sem for read" for
> example? So that these LORs will _always_ trigger rather than just once
> in a million times when the reclaim gods frown on us?

Sure, how about the below - untested - uncompiled, might eat kittens,
etc..

Just sprinkle something like:

  might_lock_read(&mm->mmap_sem);

in the right places.

---
Subject: lockdep: might_lock annotation

useful to establish a lock dependency in case the actual dependency is
rare or hard to trigger.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
---
diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
index 331e5f1..0aa657a 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -480,4 +480,22 @@ static inline void print_irqtrace_events(struct task_struct *curr)
 # define lock_map_release(l)			do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+# define might_lock(lock) 						\
+do {									\
+	typecheck(struct lockdep_map *, &(lock)->dep_map);		\
+	lock_acquire(&(lock)->dep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, NULL, _THIS_IP_);	\
+	lock_release(&(lock)->dep_map, 0, _THIS_IP_);			\
+} while (0)
+# define might_lock_read(lock) 						\
+do {									\
+	typecheck(struct lockdep_map *, &(lock)->dep_map);		\
+	lock_acquire(&(lock)->dep_map, 0, 0, 1, 2, NULL, _THIS_IP_);	\
+	lock_release(&(lock)->dep_map, 0, _THIS_IP_);			\
+} while (0)
+#else
+# define might_lock(lock) do { } while (0)
+# define might_lock_read(lock) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
 #endif /* __LINUX_LOCKDEP_H */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/