linux-kernel - Re: [stable] regression in iptables: recent filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:29:43 +1000
From:	Grant Coady <grant_lkml@...o.com.au>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] regression in iptables: recent filter

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:11:32 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

>On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:53:35AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote:
>> Last known good kernel: 2.6.24.7
>> 
>> # iptables -N calmrate
>> # iptables -A calmrate -p tcp -m state --state NEW \
>> 	-m recent --name listrate --update --rttl \
>> 	--seconds 60 --hitcount 60 -j DROP
>> iptables: Unknown error 4294967295
>> 
>> Fails for 2.6.25.17 and 2.6.26.5
>> 
>> dmesg + config: http://bugsplatter.id.au/kernel/boxen/deltree/
>
>You were einvaled by the following commit:
>
>Reloading module with ip_pkt_list_tot=60 should fix it.

Thanks, I just been through the sources and reached the same 
conclusion -- yes, okay with the ip_pkt_list_tot=60 :)

Not a very informative error message :(  The source needs some 
whitespace fixing too, but who cares?

Grant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/