lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:15:05 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: do_boot_cpu - add check if we have ESR register [Yinghai Lu - Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 02:57:17AM -0700] | > | > Actually it's resend of the patch. On previous attempt | > Yinghai was proposed to choose: | > | >> one apic_version or boot_cpu_apic_version could be enough | > | > but I think it should be different patch which does cleaning | > up variables usage. So for now I think _this_ patch is enough | > since idea is to prevent of touching nonexistant register rather | > code cleaning (whci could be done later). | | do we have systems that have mixed cpu supported with different apic version? | | YH | Yinghai what was the reason of this question? I've a suspicious you're planning to test apic version early and only _once_ so eliminating APIC_INTERGRATED call? Am I right? - Cyrill - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists