linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] Collect statistics required for powersave balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:54:20 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To:	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Collier-Brown <davecb@....com>,
	Tim Connors <tconnors@...ro.swin.edu.au>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] Collect statistics required for powersave
	balance

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 09:48:09PM +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> Update sched domain level statistics with the minimum load and
> group leader who can pull more tasks. Also suggest a powersave
> movement if the domain is otherwise balanced.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  kernel/sched.c |   97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 8c394a4..dd87061 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -3219,6 +3219,103 @@ void update_sd_loads(struct sd_loads *sdl, struct group_loads *gl)
> 
>  }
> 
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
> +void update_powersavings_group_loads(struct sd_loads *sdl,
> +				     struct group_loads *gl,
> +				     enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> +{
> +	int group_capacity = gl->group->__cpu_power / SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Busy processors will not participate in power savings
> +	 * balance.
> +	 */
> +	if (idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE ||
> +			!(sdl->sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the local group is idle or completely loaded
> +	 * no need to do power savings balance at this domain
> +	 * Same case of non-local groups as well
> +	 */
	Are there groups other than local and non-local ?
	If not, this comment can be condensed so that it can be applied
	to all groups :-)

> +	if (gl->nr_running >= group_capacity || gl->nr_running == 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the group which has the least non-idle load.
> +	 * This is the group from where we need to pick up the load
> +	 * for saving power
> +	 */
> +	if (!sdl->min_load_group.group)
> +		sdl->min_load_group = *gl;
> +	else {
> +		if (gl->nr_running < sdl->min_load_group.nr_running)
> +			sdl->min_load_group = *gl;
> +		/* If the loads are equal, then prefer the cpu with
> +		 * less logical number
> +		 */
> +		else if (gl->nr_running == sdl->min_load_group.nr_running &&
> +			 first_cpu(gl->group->cpumask) <
> +			 first_cpu(sdl->min_load_group.group->cpumask))
> +			sdl->min_load_group = *gl;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Calculate the group which is almost near its
> +	 * capacity but still has some space to pick up some load
> +	 * from other group and save more power
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (gl->nr_running > 0 && gl->nr_running <= group_capacity - 1) {
> +		if (!sdl->power_save_leader_group.group)
> +			sdl->power_save_leader_group = *gl;
> +		else {
> +			if (gl->nr_running >
> +			    sdl->power_save_leader_group.nr_running)
> +				sdl->power_save_leader_group = *gl;
> +			else if (gl->nr_running ==
> +				 sdl->power_save_leader_group.nr_running &&
> +				 first_cpu(gl->group->cpumask) <
> +				 first_cpu(sdl->min_load_group.group->cpumask))
> +				sdl->power_save_leader_group = *gl;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static struct sched_group *powersavings_balance_group(struct sd_loads *sdl,
> +	struct group_loads *gl, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
> +	unsigned long *imbalance)
> +{
> +	*imbalance = 0;
> +	if (idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE || !(sdl->sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (sdl->local.group == sdl->power_save_leader_group.group &&
> +		sdl->power_save_leader_group.group !=
> +		sdl->min_load_group.group) {
> +		*imbalance = sdl->min_load_group.avg_load_per_task;
> +		return sdl->min_load_group.group;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +#else
> +void update_powersavings_group_loads(struct sd_loads *sdl,
> +			struct group_loads *gl, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
> +{
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sched_group *powersavings_balance_group(struct sd_loads *sdl,
> +	struct group_loads *gl, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
> +	unsigned long *imbalance)
> +{
> +	*imbalance = 0;
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * find_busiest_group finds and returns the busiest CPU group within the
>   * domain. It calculates and returns the amount of weighted load which

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/