lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:58:59 +0200
From:	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Nathalie Furmento <nathalie.furmento@...ri.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: make do_move_pages() complexity linear

Brice Goglin wrote:
> Page migration is currently very slow because its overhead is quadratic
> with the number of pages. This is caused by each single page migration
> doing a linear lookup in the page array in new_page_node().
>     
> Since pages are stored in the array order in the pagelist and do_move_pages
> process this list in order, new_page_node() can increase the "pm" pointer
> to the page array so that the next iteration will find the next page in
> 0 or few lookup steps.
>     
> [...]
>  
> +/*
> + * Allocate a page on the node given as a page_to_node in private.
> + * Increase private to point to the next page_to_node so that the
> + * next iteration does not have to traverse the whole pm array.
> + */
>  static struct page *new_page_node(struct page *p, unsigned long private,
>  		int **result)
>  {
> -	struct page_to_node *pm = (struct page_to_node *)private;
> +	struct page_to_node **pmptr = (struct page_to_node **)private;
> +	struct page_to_node *pm = *pmptr;
>  
>  	while (pm->node != MAX_NUMNODES && pm->page != p)
>  		pm++;
>  
> +	/* prepare for the next iteration */
> +	*pmptr = pm + 1;
> +
>   

Actually, this "pm+1" breaks the case where migrate_pages() calls
unmap_and_move() multiple times on the same page. In this case, we need
the while loop to look at pm instead of pm+1 first. So we can't cache
pm+1 in private, but caching pm is ok. There will be 1 while loop
instead of 0 in the regular case. Updated patch (with more comments)
coming soon.

Brice

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ