linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-09-24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:52:39 +0300
From:	"Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@...il.com>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc:	"Zhu Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2008-09-24

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:47 PM, John W. Linville
<linville@...driver.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 05:57:33PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:41 PM, John W. Linville
>> <linville@...driver.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:47:02PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 17:17 -0600, John W. Linville wrote:
>> >> > Dave,
>> >> >
>> >> > One more for 2.6.27 -- a fix for a possible interrupt storm.  There is
>> >> > even a link in the commit log to a youtube video of the storm in
>> >> > progress. :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Let me know if there are problems!
>> >>
>> >> Can you also add this one? It doesn't panic the kernel when a frame from
>> >> firmware is invalid.
>> >>
>> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=122219037706528&w=2
>> >
>> > Is there an open bug report for that anywhere?  Is this something
>> > that real users (no offense to Johannes) are likely to hit?
>>
>> I'm just exporting the major bugs from our internal database to
>> buzilla, 5000 is new so
>> we are hitting the problems during testing  before users report them.
>>
>> Now I don't know if it was good idea to push the driver upstream same
>> time as it hits the market.
>
> You're right -- pushing it sooner rather than sitting on it internally
> probably would have helped to give it more visibility sooner.

 I think it was pushed on time it would not bring the fixes sooner.
But we are getting again to the same arguments
Tomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/