linux-kernel - Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:58:42 -0400
From:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To:	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	agospoda@...hat.com, "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
	"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
	"Graham, David" <david.graham@...el.com>, kkiel@...e.de,
	tglx@...utronix.de, chris.jones@...onical.com,
	arjan@...ux.jf.intel.com
Subject: Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status

Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> hardware affected:
> laptops and desktops with 82566 or 82567 based LAN parts, which are 
> machines with the ICH8 and ICH9 chipsets and a variety of processors.
> The machines I know of that have reported the issue include
> Lenovo X300
> HP 2510p
> Intel DP35JO
> Lenovo T61 (possibly)
> Lenovo X61 (possibly)

My Intel DG45ID board has an ICH10R chipset, and it also has an 82567LM, just as 
some of the affected systems.  Is there some reason why ICH10 is not 
susceptible, or have we simply not seen it?

-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/