linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix: x86: remove cpu_vendor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:49:42 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix: x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev


* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Alexander van Heukelum
> <heukelum@...lshack.com> wrote:
> > x86_64-kernels after commit 10a434fcb "x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev"
> > crashed on qemu-system-x86_64 due to a typo in vmlinux_64.lds.S.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >> Moreover, a defconfig won't run :-/ (on qemu-system-x86_64).
> >> Bisection pointed to commit 10a434fcb "x86: remove cpu_vendor_dev".
> >> The kernel crashes early with a general protection fault in a call
> >> to strnlen. I have no idea what goes wrong, yet.
> >
> > It took quite some time, but I found the problem... I'll leave
> > the other one to you ;).
> >
> > Greetings,
> >        Alexander
> >
> >  arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
> > index 201e81a..46e0544 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux_64.lds.S
> > @@ -172,8 +172,8 @@ SECTIONS
> >   .x86_cpu_dev.init : AT(ADDR(.x86_cpu_dev.init) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> >        *(.x86_cpu_dev.init)
> >   }
> > -  SECURITY_INIT
> >   __x86_cpu_dev_end = .;
> > +  SECURITY_INIT
> >
> >   . = ALIGN(8);
> >   .parainstructions : AT(ADDR(.parainstructions) - LOAD_OFFSET) {
> >
> 
> that is merging problem, Ingo should fix that already...

indeed. I've fixed it in tip/x86/traps by applying Alexander's patch.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/