linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill-input doesn't work until 5 minutes after boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 4 Oct 2008 21:43:41 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc:	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, IvDoorn@...il.com, hmh@....eng.br,
	sitsofe@...oo.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rfkill-input doesn't work until 5 minutes after boot

On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:43:34 +0100 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:

> rfkill-input implements debounce as follows:
> 
>         if (time_after(jiffies, task->last + msecs_to_jiffies(200))) {
> 
> However, task->last is initialised to 0 while jiffies starts at -300*HZ. 
> Any input within 5 minutes of kernel start is therefore ignored. Fix by 
> initialising task->last correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Set the last event value at module load time, since otherwise we'll have 
> a window of failure if someone loads the module in a few hundred million 
> years. I look forward to being rewarded by the post-humans for caring so 
> much about them.

Jiffies wraparound is 49.7 days at HZ=1000.

> diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> index e5b6955..86197bb 100644
> --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,11 @@ static struct input_handler rfkill_handler = {
>  
>  static int __init rfkill_handler_init(void)
>  {
> +	rfkill_wlan.last = jiffies - HZ/5;
> +	rfkill_bt.last = jiffies - HZ/5;
> +	rfkill_uwb.last = jiffies - HZ/5;
> +	rfkill_wimax.last = jiffies - HZ/5;
> +	rfkill_wwan.last = jiffies - HZ/5;
>  	return input_register_handler(&rfkill_handler);
>  }

If someone adds a new rfkill_foo there's a risk that they'll forget to
make the corresponding change here.  A comment at the definition sites
would help.


Or, better, do something like

static struct rfkill_task rfkill_tasks[] = {
	DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK(RFKILL_TYPE_WLAN),
	...
};

#define rfkill_wlan	rfkill_tasks[0]
...

	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rfkill_tasks); i++)
		...


but the new definition of DEFINE_RFKILL_TASK gets tricky.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/