[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:40:05 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 03:17 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> I was so lucky to 'guess' (just after couple of hundreds of compilations),
> that it corresponds to 8f4d37ec073c17e2d4aa8851df5837d798606d6f commit about
> high-resolution timers, attached patch against 2.6.25 brings tbench
> performance for the 2.6.25 kernel tree to 455 MB/s.
can you try
echo NO_HRTICK > /debug/sched_features
on .27 like kernels?
Also, what clocksource do those machines use?
cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
As to, a7be37ac8e1565e00880531f4e2aff421a21c803, could you try
tip/master? I reworked some of the wakeup preemption code in there.
Thanks for looking into this issue!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists