linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:58:21 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	7eggert@....de
Cc:	Adam Tla?ka <atlka@...gda.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive

> Alan, do you agree? Or is it required to take both locks at the same time?
> If it is, in which order?

I don't agree. Please read the code more carefully. In paticular note
that TIOCGWINSZ is driven off the tty side of any tty/pty pair. That we
set the pty size termios bits is really a curiousity of history.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/