linux-kernel - Re: [linux-cifs-client] Fwd: [PATCH] Fix CIFS compilation with CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:12:26 +0800
From:	"Guo-Fu Tseng" <cooldavid@...ldavid.org>
To:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	"Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"samba-technical@...ts.samba.org" <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
	"linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org" 
	<linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] Fwd: [PATCH] Fix CIFS compilation with CONFIG_KEYS unset

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:59:03 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:40:39 -0500
> "Steve French" <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Rafael and Guo-Fu,
> > The following change to address the compile error that you noted is
> > slightly different than what you suggested but should fix what you
> > found.
> >
> 
> Actually, I like Adrian/Rafael's fix better. I think we should avoid
> cluttering up the code with #ifdef's where possible. key_put() already
> is a no-op when CONFIG_KEYS is disabled. We might as well do the same
> thing with key_revoke().
I found that my patch was not reasonable at all.
And I agree with Jeff.

Guo-Fu Tseng

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/