linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Mention Intel Atom in Kconfig.cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:30:51 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Phil Endecott <phil_wueww_endecott@...zphil.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mention Intel Atom in Kconfig.cpu

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:18:48AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:28:06 +0200
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > "Phil Endecott" <phil_wueww_endecott@...zphil.org> writes:
> > 
> > > Am I right in thinking that CONFIG_MCORE2 is the correct choice for
> > > an Intel Atom? 
> > 
> > No, Atom is completely different from a Core2.
> > 
> > Right now 586 or 686 is a reasonable choice.
> 
> actually 586 is completely wrong.

It is nearest in scheduling at least. You'll lose CMOV, but that's
not a big loss.

> Core2 instruction set with tune=generic is still the best to set.

Not sure that is true. These option are mostly for the compiler.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/