linux-kernel - Re: SLUB defrag pull request?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:28:43 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	cl@...ux-foundation.org
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, hugh@...itas.com,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, penberg@...helsinki.fi,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: SLUB defrag pull request?

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > I think it's wrong to unhash dentries while they are possibly still
> > being used.  You can do the shrink_dcache_parent() here, but should
> > leave the unhashing to be done by prune_one_dentry(), after it's been
> > checked that there are no other users of the dentry.
> >
> >   
> d_invalidate() calls shrink_dcache_parent() as needed and will fail if 
> there are other users of the dentry.

Only if it's a directory.  Now unhashing an in-use non-directory is
not fatal, but you'll get things like "filename (deleted)" in /proc,
and suchlike.  Don't do it.

Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/