lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:45:59 -0300
From:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 17/18] net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c needs <linux/sched.h>

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> 
> For some m68k configs, I get:
> 
> | net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c: In function 'rfkill_start':
> | net/rfkill/rfkill-input.c:208: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 
> As the incomplete type is `struct task_struct', including <linux/sched.h> fixes
> it.

Line 208 is this (in latest Linus mainline and also v2.6.27):

spin_unlock_irq(&handle->dev->event_lock);

So we need to include sched.h to everything that uses spin_unlock_irq?  If
only some variants of m68k need that, shouldn't it have been added on the
header that defines spin_unlock_irq() on those arches, instead?

Or am I looking at a different version of rfkill-input.c than what you based
that error message on?

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ