linux-kernel - Re: Oprofile kernel git tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:10:22 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	oprofile-list <oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Oprofile kernel git tree

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:56:45PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 13.10.08 22:33:18, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com> writes:
> > >
> > > Feature branches (patches not yet ready for upstream, fast-forward only):
> > >
> > >  arch-perfmon
> > 
> > What do you mean with that? arch-perfmon is definitely ready for upstream.
> 
> This contains only the patch I wrote that changes the
> initialization. All other patches are already in the upstream branch.

I see. Thanks. The init change is unfortunately not correct.
Doing it this way would require quite a big restructuring
to call the init functions in the right order. Probably not
worth it to avoid one function call.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/