linux-kernel - Re: Please pull arch perfmon update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:15:07 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Please pull arch perfmon update

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 13.10.08 22:29:51, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > I added a follow on patch (446223f) on branch arch-perfmon that
> > 
> > I didn't do that intentionally because it's called too late.
> > The function really has to be called early, so that the fallback
> > works.
> 
> The hook is in op_nmi_init() and directly called after
> arch_perfmon_init() and before init_sysfs(). Only
> register_cpu_notifier() and the setup of oprofile_operations are in
> between. This should work.

The problem is that arch perfmon init should only be called after
the other initialization function failed.

So you would need a chain of op_x86_model_spec for fallback.

It's simpler and cleaner to just write that out in explicit C.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/