lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:08:29 +0100 From: Steve Kemp <steve@...ve.org.uk> To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: trivial patches: Should we care about control reaches end of non-void function On Wed Oct 15, 2008 at 23:26:25 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Probably better to mark BUG() properly for the compiler. Good idea. It seems this was attempted previously: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0402.0/0843.html The patch needs some updating to move it into the current location, but passes a compile test at least. Steve -- Managed Anti-Spam Service http://mail-scanning.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists