| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:11:21 +1000 From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...il.com> To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27-rc1 2008/10/18 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>: > > > On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Please pull the 'drm-next' branch from >> ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git drm-next > > Grr. > > This whole merge series has been full of people sending me UNTESTED CRAP. > > So what's the excuse _this_ time for adding all these stupid warnings to > my build log? Did nobody test this? The code has been tested on 32 and 64 bit in lots of places, however I don't generally trawl the Fedora kernel build logs, and the amount of warnings we have there, new ones just get lost in the mists.. So its not untested on 64-bit, its just nobody who cared enough saw the compiler warnings. If linux-next had been going for the past few weeks someone would have spotted them, I just got the report yesterday from linux-next after I fed the push request. Perhaps we all need access to the Ingo compile farm. Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists