linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix hang on i386 when panic occurs while console

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:42:11 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, hbabu@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: fix hang on i386 when panic occurs while
	console_sem is held

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:13:39PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hey all-
> > 	Theres a corner case in 32 bit x86 kdump at the moment.  When 
> > the box panics via nmi, we call bust_spinlocks(1) to disable 
> > sensitivity to the console_sem (allowing us to print to the console in 
> > all cases), but we don't call crash_kexec, until after we call 
> > bust_spinlocks(0), which re-enables console_sem sensitivity.  The 
> > result is that, if we get an nmi while the console_sem is held and 
> > kdump is configured, and we try to print something to the console 
> > during kdump shutdown (which we often do) we deadlock the box.  The 
> > fix is to simply do what 64 bit die_nmi does which is to not call 
> > bust_spinlocks(0) until after we call crash_kexec.  Patch below tested 
> > successfully by me:
> 
> applied to tip/x86/urgent, thanks Neil!
> 
Thanks, Ingo!

> >  dumpstack_32.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> would be nice to unify this code some more - to create a new 
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c and fill it in with die_nmi() as a 
> beginning?
> 
Agreed, I'll try look into that as soon as I have some free time.

Regards
Neil

> 	Ingo
> 

-- 
/****************************************************
 * Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
 * Software Engineer, Red Hat
 ****************************************************/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/