lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:42:43 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> Cc: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, i2c@...sensors.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] gpiolib: implement dev_gpiochip_{add,remove} calls On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 05:03:47AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:29:20AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > But it doesn't work as a module (i.e. OF-specific bits should be > > > always in-kernel). > > > > Why not ? > > If say "X" driver loads prior to bus-notifier module (where we fill > the platform data), then X.0 device will try to probe w/o platform > data and will fail. The only way to re-probe things is to rmmod X && > insmod of_pdata_filler_X && insmod X. So things depend on the module > load order. Thinking about it more, I started recalling other issues. The bus notifier chain doesn't replay previous events, so we also have to register the notifier before the _devices_ are registered. And this ruins the whole approach. :-/ Yeah, that's why I abandoned the bus notifier idea. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@...il.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists