lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:12:32 +0200
From:	Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@....mpg.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Henning Fehrmann <henning.fehrmann@....mpg.de>
Subject: Idle core on overloaded CPU?

Hi,

on Intel X3220 CPU based systems (4 physical cores) I came across the
following thing (Debian etch, with vanilla kernel 2.6.25.9):

starting the following:
$ screen -d -m stress -c 2
$ nice -19 screen -d -m stress -c 4

This causes two cores to be 100% busy in user state and one core to be
busy in 100% nice state. However, the remaining core is idle. Even
watching it over longer stretches of time, the situation remains static.

I guess it's a kernel misconfiguration on my part (config available here:
https://n0.aei.uni-hannover.de/linux/kernel/config-2.6.25.9-nodes
), but if not could this be a scheduling bug?

Thanks for any hint

Cheers

Carsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ