linux-kernel - Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	efault@....de
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, mingo@...e.hu, s0mbre@...rvice.net.ru,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tbench regression fixes]: digging out smelly deadmen.

From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:05:01 +0200

> My test data indicates (to me anyway) that there is another source of
> localhost throughput loss in .27.  In that data, there is no hrtick
> overhead since I didn't have highres timers enabled, and computational
> costs added in .27 were removed.  Dunno where it lives, but it does
> appear to exist.

Disabling TSO on loopback doesn't fix that bit for you?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/