linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:11:20 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jmorris@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] User namespaces: set of cleanups (v2)

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> > Those patches aren't likely to change much, and they get hit with LTP
> > regularly.
> 
> They already changed between what I thought was the correct branch and
> what was the correct branch :-)

If you're talking about between James's two creds branches, he did ask you to
pull from the new one - just before you went on holiday, so I suspect you
didn't see it till you got back.

If you're talking about my creds-v3 and creds-v4 branches, the difference was
merge conflicts with Linus, nothing more.  And really, I should just have
thrown the merge on top of creds-v3 rather than trying to maintain my patchset
and producing a creds-v4.  That's one of the reasons I'd like to recreate my
kernel.org tree - to get rid of the unnecessary labels.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/