Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:16:33 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, tglx@...uxtronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:57:48PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 02:50:29PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:59:30PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:12:09PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > trivial ported it to seq_file.
> > > > seq_file are very good for the output buffer.
> > > 
> > > Thank you for putting this together!!!  Looks good at first glance --
> > > I will test it out.
> > 
> > So it does seem to operate correctly.  I combined it with my patch and
> > applied against 2.6.27 for ease of testing.
> > 
> > One question -- why the multi-line format?  This would be a bit
> > awkward on a 128-CPU system, let alone on a 4,096-CPU system.
> > Or am I missing some trick here?
> 
> To clarify, by "missing some trick", I am wondering if there is some
> command that works in blocks of lines.  After all, /proc/cpuinfo
> produces the same sort of output that your patch does.  ;-)

Ported to 2.6.27 to ease testing, and fixed up the formatting a bit.
I remember quickly scanning through one-line-per-CPU data to find
problems with rcutree.c, but the expanded names are quite nice -- I
had to brutally abbreviate to fit each CPU on a single line.
And I agree that seqfile does work nicely for this.

I am strongly tempted to suggest CSV format output with headers to
allow the data to be pulled into gnumeric or oocalc -- this would
make handling large numbers of CPUs much easier.  (Quickly donning
the asbestos suit with titanium pinstripes...)

							Thanx, Paul


Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---

 include/linux/rcuclassic.h |    4 
 kernel/Kconfig.preempt     |    1 
 kernel/Makefile            |    2 
 kernel/rcuclassic.c        |    5 -
 kernel/rcuclassic_trace.c  |  198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 207 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcuclassic.h b/include/linux/rcuclassic.h
index 4ab8436..735f35a 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcuclassic.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcuclassic.h
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ struct rcu_ctrlblk {
 				 /* for current batch to proceed.        */
 } ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
 
+extern struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk;
+extern struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_bh_ctrlblk;
+
 /* Is batch a before batch b ? */
 static inline int rcu_batch_before(long a, long b)
 {
@@ -76,6 +79,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
 	long		quiescbatch;     /* Batch # for grace period */
 	int		passed_quiesc;	 /* User-mode/idle loop etc. */
 	int		qs_pending;	 /* core waits for quiesc state */
+	bool		beenonline;	 /* CPU online at least once */
 
 	/* 2) batch handling */
 	long  	       	batch;           /* Batch # for current RCU batch */
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index 9fdba03..ba32338 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ config PREEMPT_RCU
 
 config RCU_TRACE
 	bool "Enable tracing for RCU - currently stats in debugfs"
-	depends on PREEMPT_RCU
 	select DEBUG_FS
 	default y
 	help
diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
index 4e1d7df..e0bfce7 100644
--- a/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/Makefile
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CLASSIC_RCU) += rcuclassic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) += rcupreempt.o
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU),y)
 obj-$(CONFIG_RCU_TRACE) += rcupreempt_trace.o
+else
+obj-$(CONFIG_RCU_TRACE) += rcuclassic_trace.o
 endif
 obj-$(CONFIG_RELAY) += relay.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += utsname_sysctl.o
diff --git a/kernel/rcuclassic.c b/kernel/rcuclassic.c
index aad93cd..06472fc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcuclassic.c
+++ b/kernel/rcuclassic.c
@@ -57,13 +57,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_lock_map);
 
 
 /* Definition for rcupdate control block. */
-static struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = {
+struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_ctrlblk = {
 	.cur = -300,
 	.completed = -300,
 	.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&rcu_ctrlblk.lock),
 	.cpumask = CPU_MASK_NONE,
 };
-static struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_bh_ctrlblk = {
+struct rcu_ctrlblk rcu_bh_ctrlblk = {
 	.cur = -300,
 	.completed = -300,
 	.lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&rcu_bh_ctrlblk.lock),
@@ -564,6 +564,7 @@ static void rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp,
 	rdp->donetail = &rdp->donelist;
 	rdp->quiescbatch = rcp->completed;
 	rdp->qs_pending = 0;
+	rdp->beenonline = 1;
 	rdp->cpu = cpu;
 	rdp->blimit = blimit;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/rcuclassic_trace.c b/kernel/rcuclassic_trace.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b719048
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/rcuclassic_trace.c
@@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
+/*
+ * Read-Copy Update tracing for classic implementation
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corporation, 2008
+ *
+ * Updated to use seqfile by Lai Jiangshan.
+ *
+ * Papers:  http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU
+ *
+ * For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see -
+ * 		Documentation/RCU
+ *
+ */
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/debugfs.h>
+#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+
+/* Print out rcu_data structures using seqfile facility. */
+
+static struct rcu_data *get_rcu_data_bh(int cpu)
+{
+	return &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu);
+}
+
+static struct rcu_data *get_rcu_data(int cpu)
+{
+	return &per_cpu(rcu_data, cpu);
+}
+
+static int show_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = v;
+
+	if (!rdp->beenonline)
+		return 0;
+
+	seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %d", rdp->cpu);
+	if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu))
+		seq_puts(m, "!\n");
+	else
+		seq_puts(m, "\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "quiescbatch\t: %ld\n", rdp->quiescbatch);
+	seq_printf(m, "batch\t\t: %ld\n", rdp->batch);
+	seq_printf(m, "passed_quiesc\t: %d\n", rdp->passed_quiesc);
+	seq_printf(m, "qs_pending\t: %d\n", rdp->qs_pending);
+	seq_printf(m, "qlen\t\t: %ld\n", rdp->qlen);
+	seq_printf(m, "blimit\t\t: %ld\n", rdp->blimit);
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	typedef struct rcu_data *(*get_data_func)(int);
+
+	if (*pos == 0)  /* just in case, cpu 0 is not the first */
+		*pos = first_cpu(cpu_possible_map);
+	else
+		*pos = next_cpu_nr(*pos - 1, cpu_possible_map);
+	if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
+		return ((get_data_func)m->private)(*pos);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void *c_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
+{
+	(*pos)++;
+	return c_start(m, pos);
+}
+
+static void c_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
+{
+}
+
+const struct seq_operations rcu_data_seq_op = {
+	.start	= c_start,
+	.next	= c_next,
+	.stop	= c_stop,
+	.show	= show_rcu_data,
+};
+
+static int rcu_data_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	int ret = seq_open(file, &rcu_data_seq_op);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	((struct seq_file *)file->private_data)->private = inode->i_private;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct file_operations rcu_data_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.open		= rcu_data_open,
+	.read		= seq_read,
+	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.release	= seq_release,
+};
+
+/* Print out rcu_ctrlblk structures using seqfile facility. */
+
+static void print_one_rcu_ctrlblk(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp)
+{
+	seq_printf(m, "cur=%ld  completed=%ld   next_pending=%d  s=%d\n\t",
+		   rcp->cur, rcp->completed, rcp->next_pending, rcp->signaled);
+	seq_cpumask(m, &rcp->cpumask);
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
+}
+
+static int show_rcucb(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
+{
+	seq_puts(m, "rcu: ");
+	print_one_rcu_ctrlblk(m, &rcu_ctrlblk);
+	seq_puts(m, "rcu_bh: ");
+	print_one_rcu_ctrlblk(m, &rcu_bh_ctrlblk);
+	seq_puts(m, "online: ");
+	seq_cpumask(m, &cpu_online_map);
+	seq_puts(m, "\n");
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rcucb_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+{
+	return single_open(file, show_rcucb, NULL);
+}
+
+static struct file_operations rcucb_fops = {
+	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
+	.open		= rcucb_open,
+	.read		= seq_read,
+	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
+	.release	= single_release,
+};
+
+static struct dentry *rcudir, *rcu_bh_data_file, *rcu_data_file, *rcucb_file;
+
+static int __init rcuclassic_trace_init(void)
+{
+	rcudir = debugfs_create_dir("rcu", NULL);
+	if (!rcudir)
+		goto out;
+
+	rcu_bh_data_file = debugfs_create_file("rcu_bh_data", 0444, rcudir,
+					       get_rcu_data_bh, &rcu_data_fops);
+	if (!rcu_bh_data_file)
+		goto out_rcudir;
+
+	rcu_data_file = debugfs_create_file("rcu_data", 0444, rcudir,
+					    get_rcu_data, &rcu_data_fops);
+	if (!rcu_data_file)
+		goto out_rcudata_bh_file;
+
+	rcucb_file = debugfs_create_file("rcucb", 0444, rcudir,
+					 NULL, &rcucb_fops);
+	if (!rcucb_file)
+		goto out_rcudata_file;
+	return 0;
+
+out_rcudata_file:
+	debugfs_remove(rcu_data_file);
+out_rcudata_bh_file:
+	debugfs_remove(rcu_bh_data_file);
+out_rcudir:
+	debugfs_remove(rcudir);
+out:
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static void __exit rcuclassic_trace_cleanup(void)
+{
+	debugfs_remove(rcucb_file);
+	debugfs_remove(rcu_data_file);
+	debugfs_remove(rcu_bh_data_file);
+	debugfs_remove(rcudir);
+}
+
+module_init(rcuclassic_trace_init);
+module_exit(rcuclassic_trace_cleanup);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul E. McKenney");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Read-Copy Update tracing for classic implementation");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists