linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.28-rc2-mm1: possible circular locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:54:46 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc2-mm1: possible circular locking

On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:58:40 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> We've been calling schedule_on_each_cpu() from within
> lru_add_drain_all() for ages.  What changed to cause all this
> to start happening?

what started to get these out of the weed is that copy_*_user() is now
annotated to (potentially) take the mmap sem (which it does if there's
a fault)... 
previously you had to actually fault to get the lock dependency noticed.

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit atty://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/