linux-kernel - Re: sched domains oddness.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:17:21 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: sched domains oddness.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:09:29AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:

 > > looks like someone is triggering rebuild_sched_domains(), is something
 > > poking cpusetfs files or flipping between sched_mc settings?
 > 
 > I remember someone mentioning that some distro's started setting
 > sched_mc_power_savings to '1' by default during boot. On a dual-core
 > laptop, this will not give any advantage.
 > 
 > I have to fix the code to not export this tunable, when we have only
 > socket in the system.
 > 
 > Dave, Is your distro also setting this tunable blindly during boot :(

(13:15:25:davej@...o:~)$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_mc_power_savings
0

So no, unless something set it to 1, and then back to 0.

A grep of etc shows up nothing in initscripts.  Does hal or something
play with this?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/