lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2008 09:20:40 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add hierarchical accounting to cpu accounting
 controller

On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:19:37 +0530 Bharata B Rao wrote:

> Add hierarchical accounting to cpu accounting controller and cpuacct
> documentation.
> 
> Currently, while charging the task's cputime to its accounting group,
> the accounting group hierarchy isn't updated. This patch charges the cputime
> of a task to its accounting group and all its parent accounting groups.
> 
> Reported-by: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CC: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/controllers/cpuacct.txt |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/sched.c                        |   10 ++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/controllers/cpuacct.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +CPU Accounting Controller
> +-------------------------
> +
> +The CPU accounting controller is used to group tasks using cgroups and
> +account the CPU usage of these group of tasks.
> +
> +The CPU accounting controller supports multi-hierarchy groups. An accounting
> +group accumulates the CPU usage of all of it's child groups and

                                             its  {it's means "it is"}

> +the tasks directly present in it's group.

                                 its

> +
> +Accounting groups can be created by first mounting the cgroup filesystem.
> +
> +# mkdir /cgroups
> +# mount -t cgroup -ocpuacct none /cgroups
> +
> +With the above step, the initial or the parent accounting group
> +becomes visible at /cgroups. At bootup, this group comprises of all the

   "comprises of all" seems awkward to me.  Maybe "includes all" or
   "comprises all" if you have to use that word.  ;)

> +tasks in the system. /cgroups/tasks lists the tasks in this cgroup.
> +/cgroups/cpuacct.usage gives the CPU time (in nanoseconds) obtained by
> +this group which is essentially the CPU time obtained by all the tasks
> +in the system.
> +
> +New accounting groups can be created under the parent group /cgroups.
> +
> +# cd /cgroups
> +# mkdir g1
> +# echo $$ > g1
> +
> +The above steps create a new group g1 and move the current shell
> +process (bash) into it. CPU time consumed by this bash and it's children

                                                              its

> +can be obtained from g1/cpuacct.usage and the same gets accumulated in

                                                      is accumulated in

> +/cgroups/cpuacct.usage also.



> Performance numbers
> ==================
> 2x2HT=4CPU i386 running 2.6.28-rc3
> 
> All benchmarks were run from bash which belonged to the grand

                                                          grandchild (?)
Otherwise it says that the "child group" is "grand."
Oh, never mind.  I thought that this was part of a doc file, but it's not.


> child group of the topmost accounting group. The tests were
> first run on 2628rc3 and then on 2628rc3+this patch and the
> normalized difference between the two runs is shown below.
> 
> I. hackbench
> ============
> # ./hackbench 100 process 100
> Running with 100*40 (== 4000) tasks.
> Normalized time difference for avg of 5 runs: 1.0059
> 
> # ./hackbench 25 thread 100
> Running with 25*40 (== 1000) tasks.
> Normalized time difference for avg of 5 runs: 1.0139
> 
> II. lmbench
> ===========
> ---------------------
> 4 threads
> ---------------------
> size	Normalized
> (kb)	Change (Time)
> ---------------------
> 16	1.1017
> 64	1.1168
> 128	1.1072
> 256	1.0085
> --------------------
> 8 threads
> -------------------
> 16	1.1835
> 64	1.0617
> 128	0.9980
> 256	0.9682
> -------------------
> 16 threads
> -------------------
> 16	1.1186
> 64	0.9921
> 128	0.9505
> 256	1.0043
> -------------------
> 32 threads
> -------------------
> 16	1.0005
> 64	1.0089
> 128	1.0019
> 256	1.0226
> -------------------
> 64 threads
> -------------------
> 16	1.0207
> 64	1.0385
> 128	1.0109
> 256	1.0159
> -------------------
> 
> III. volanomark
> ===============
> Normalized average throughput difference for loopback test
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Nr runs		Normalized average throughput difference
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 10		0.9579
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 4		1.1465
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 9		0.9451
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 19		1.0133
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> --


---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ