linux-kernel - tty warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:24:21 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"William L. Irwin" <wli@...omorphy.com>,
	<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: tty warning

Hi Alan,

A sparc allmodconfig build gives these warnings:

drivers/char/n_tty.c: In function 'n_tty_poll':
drivers/char/n_tty.c:1592: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/n_tty.c:1601: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/n_tty.c: In function 'n_tty_read':
drivers/char/n_tty.c:1306: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c: In function 'set_termios':
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:574: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:578: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c: In function 'tty_mode_ioctl':
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:729: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:963: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:969: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:618: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:1007: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
drivers/char/tty_ioctl.c:1015: warning: array subscript is above array bounds

These are things like:

                termios->c_cc[VTIME] = 0;

termios is a (struct ktermios *) which has "cc_t c_cc[NCCS];".  NCCS is
17 and VTIME is also 17.  I assume the intention is to actually fill in
_x_cc[0], but why is it done this way and not more directly?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped