| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:47:26 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Markus Dahms <mad@...omagically.de>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-next] possible circular locking dependency for cryptsetup
Hi
I already fixed this bug.
its patch queued in mm tree, now.
(file name is mm-remove-lru_add_drain_all-from-the-munlock-path)
I expect it merge to mainline soon.
Thanks!
> Hi there,
>
> I got the following warning for 2.6.28-rc3-next-20081106, it's quiet for
> 2.6.28-rc3. Besides the new warning everything seems to work fine.
>
> As a side note, I wanted to file this at bugzilla.k.o, but there is no
> "next" tree in "alternate trees" - intended?
>
> FWIW: x86, 2xP3
>
> Greetings,
>
> Markus
>
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.28-rc3-next-20081106-mad-1 #2
> -------------------------------------------------------
> cryptsetup/2554 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}, at: [<c012cd32>] get_online_cpus+0x22/0x40
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c018b98e>] sys_mlockall+0x5e/0xd0
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){----}:
> [<c0151560>] __lock_acquire+0xf30/0x17f0
> [<c0151e7e>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x80
> [<c0187d2c>] might_fault+0x5c/0x80
> [<c0267bc6>] copy_to_user+0x36/0x120
> [<c01af074>] filldir64+0xa4/0xf0
> [<c01ead29>] sysfs_readdir+0x129/0x220
> [<c01af315>] vfs_readdir+0x95/0xb0
> [<c01af399>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xc0
> [<c010346d>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #2 (sysfs_mutex){--..}:
> [<c0151560>] __lock_acquire+0xf30/0x17f0
> [<c0151e7e>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x80
> [<c03e5be4>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb4/0x2c0
> [<c01eb0ac>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x2c/0xb0
> [<c01eb6b0>] create_dir+0x40/0x90
> [<c01eb72b>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2b/0x50
> [<c026116f>] kobject_add_internal+0xcf/0x240
> [<c02613b1>] kobject_add_varg+0x31/0x50
> [<c0261807>] kobject_init_and_add+0x27/0x30
> [<c019e4b3>] sysfs_slab_add+0x83/0x1a0
> [<c019e61e>] sysfs_add_func+0x4e/0x70
> [<c013c6b5>] run_workqueue+0xe5/0x1f0
> [<c013c848>] worker_thread+0x88/0xf0
> [<c01402ec>] kthread+0x3c/0x70
> [<c01042ff>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x18
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #1 (slub_lock){----}:
> [<c0151560>] __lock_acquire+0xf30/0x17f0
> [<c0151e7e>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x80
> [<c03e65d7>] down_read+0x37/0x50
> [<c03e40da>] slab_cpuup_callback+0x3a/0x192
> [<c01452cd>] notifier_call_chain+0x2d/0x70
> [<c01453c9>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x20
> [<c03e334e>] _cpu_up+0x5e/0x105
> [<c03e3459>] cpu_up+0x64/0x7b
> [<c055430f>] kernel_init+0xb6/0x173
> [<c01042ff>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x18
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&cpu_hotplug.lock){--..}:
> [<c0151691>] __lock_acquire+0x1061/0x17f0
> [<c0151e7e>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x80
> [<c03e5be4>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb4/0x2c0
> [<c012cd32>] get_online_cpus+0x22/0x40
> [<c013d2c8>] schedule_on_each_cpu+0x38/0xe0
> [<c018115d>] lru_add_drain_all+0xd/0x10
> [<c018b486>] __mlock_vma_pages_range+0x36/0x1f0
> [<c018b74f>] mlock_fixup+0x10f/0x210
> [<c018b8db>] do_mlockall+0x8b/0xa0
> [<c018b9c1>] sys_mlockall+0x91/0xd0
> [<c010346d>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 1 lock held by cryptsetup/2554:
> #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c018b98e>] sys_mlockall+0x5e/0xd0
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 2554, comm: cryptsetup Not tainted 2.6.28-rc3-next-20081106-mad-1 #2
> Call Trace:
> [<c03e45d2>] ? printk+0x18/0x1e
> [<c0150213>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xc3/0xd0
> [<c014ff4b>] ? print_circular_bug_entry+0x4b/0x50
> [<c0151691>] __lock_acquire+0x1061/0x17f0
> [<c0151e7e>] lock_acquire+0x5e/0x80
> [<c012cd32>] ? get_online_cpus+0x22/0x40
> [<c03e5be4>] mutex_lock_nested+0xb4/0x2c0
> [<c012cd32>] ? get_online_cpus+0x22/0x40
> [<c012cd32>] ? get_online_cpus+0x22/0x40
> [<c019f391>] ? __percpu_alloc_mask+0xa1/0x100
> [<c012cd32>] get_online_cpus+0x22/0x40
> [<c013d2c8>] schedule_on_each_cpu+0x38/0xe0
> [<c0180ed0>] ? lru_add_drain_per_cpu+0x0/0x10
> [<c018115d>] lru_add_drain_all+0xd/0x10
> [<c018b486>] __mlock_vma_pages_range+0x36/0x1f0
> [<c022c109>] ? avc_has_perm+0x59/0x70
> [<c018b74f>] mlock_fixup+0x10f/0x210
> [<c018b8db>] do_mlockall+0x8b/0xa0
> [<c018b9c1>] sys_mlockall+0x91/0xd0
> [<c010346d>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31
>
> --
> ubuntu is an ancient african word meaning "i can't install debian."
> -- unknown
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists